4. Waterlogged Wood Conservation
- an Overview
by Kate Hunter
Kate Hunter in conversation with Professor
Sean McGrail
at the UWCN conference.
Kate Hunter's talk dealt with the history and practicalities
involved in the conservation of waterlogged wood, presenting a graphic
illustration of her role as Keeper of Conservation at Newport Museum
and Art Gallery, with responsibility for the care of the mediaeval ship
and the other recovered artefacts.
New artefact identifications
First of all and with thanks to Dr Mark Redknapp, of
the NMAGW, she announced new identifications for three important artefacts.
The previously reported pieces of engraved brass strapping are decorative
pieces from a military helmet, including a right cheek guard. Two other
finds were, firstly a lined leather archer's wristguard with an embossed
decoration of hearts, flowers and a Latin inscription, and secondly,
a fragment of an hourglass which would have been used for navigation.
Conservation - Why is it necessary?
Moving onto the main subject of her talk she outlined
the history of waterlogged wood conservation, describing what happens
to archaeological wood as it decays. Although waterlogged wood appears
to be sound, if allowed to dry out it shrinks differentially, leading
to cracking with a loss of surface detail, ,warping and in the case
of very degraded timbers total loss. Retention of surface detail is
vital for the preservation of tool signatures etc. Prevention of warpage
is important if reconstruction of any large object is intended.
Until the mid C20th treatment of large waterlogged objects
presented serious problems and many have not survived. Other artefacts
which had been treated with materials like alum, which decays with age,
have since been retreated with PEG. Controlled air drying has also been
tried, successfully with some objects, but not always. Preliminary tests
on a small sample of timber from the Newport Ship, carried out by Dr
Mark Jones, of the Mary Rose Trust, indicated that controlled air drying
could lead to substantial levels of differential shrinkage.
The introduction of PEG (polyethylene glycol) in the
late 1950's was the beginning of the development of reliable and successful
treatments for waterlogged wood. The first large scale project was the
spraying of the Swedish warship Vasa which began in 1962 and lasted
17 years. PEG is produced in a wide range of molecular weights which
can be chosen for use according to how degraded, or not, the wood is.
PEG has been used as a spray, as at the Vasa and the Mary Rose, but
this method is very time consuming. The more commonly used methods are
via a tanking system when the wood is immersed in heated tanks of PEG
over a period of time. Or in a process known as freeze-drying, which
involves some tanking but has the advantage of using smaller concentrations
of PEG (a relatively expensive material) and being a shorter procedure.
However, the number of suitable freeze driers both in the UK and elsewhere
is limited and that presents a time constraint in itself. Both tanking
and freeze-drying produce good results, although freeze drying produces
a wood which is lighter in weight, and usually colour, after treatment.
Before any treatment is decided it is necessary to carry
out a condition assessment. Quoting Jim Spriggs of the York Archaeological
Trust "Before any suitable conservation regime is applied to wood it
is necessary to quantify where possible, the level of decay suffered.
Only then can the correct treatment regime be constructed to take into
account the loss of material from the cell structure or 'wood substance'
as it can be described."
The Newport Ship
At this stage nobody knows how the ship will be conserved.
A detailed condition assessment has yet to be undertaken which would
normally require a large number of samples to be taken at different
levels over the whole length of the ship. Sampling could be integrated
with an archaeological research programme, for instance dendrochronology,
as was done with the Barland's Farm boat. In the choice of treatments
for the Newport Ship there was a real advantage because the ship had
been taken apart piece by piece, so that timbers could be individually
treated and a full range of conservation processes was available. Miss
Hunter stressed, however, that no treatment could be guaranteed 100%
effective, and that in similar projects detailed recording had taken
place in advance of treatment. Additionally once conservation treatment
commenced timbers were less easy, if not impossible, to access.
In brief for a project of this scale:
- A condition assessment will be needed before a choice of conservation
treatments is made. This could be coordinated with other archaeological
research.
- Before treatment begins some level of recording must be completed.
Close liaison with the archaeologists is necessary throughout.
- The facilities offered by Corus were excellent for recording but
not at present for the treatment process.
- Whatever the final preferred conservation option, there remains
the question of where it will be done.
Kate Hunter, is Keeper of Conservationat
Newport Museum
& Art Gallery and has responsibility for the care of the
timbers and other artefacts recovered with the ship.
Summary of the presentation prepared
by Ron McCormick
10th June 2003
Individual papers
1. "Need the excitement be a
nightmare?" by George Lambrick
2. Excavating the Ship by
Kate Howell
3. The Wood Record by Nigel
Nayling
4. Waterlogged Wood Conservation - an Overview by Kate Hunter
5. The Post Excavation Process
by Sean McGrail
6. Future Planning Considerations
for the Newport Ship by Gustav Milne
7. Overview and Summary
The Newport Medieval
Ship in its Context
- Research,
Conservation and Display
Saturday 10th May 2003
University of Wales College
Newport
Caerleon,
Newport,
South Wales, UK
Organised by UWCN in association
with
the Friends of the Newport Ship
and Chepstow Archaeological Society
top